Legal Opinion

United States v. Herbert Hoover Akin

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1970No. 28855_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a jury conviction for unlawfully receiving and possessing goods transported in interstate commerce. 1 Appellant contends that an incriminating statement obtained from him by the FBI was impermissibly ad mitted against him in his trial because he was not given a proper Miranda warning. 2 After a careful review of the record, we have concluded that appellant was not entitled to Miranda warnings because he was not “in custody” at the time he was questioned.

Because of the difficulty of formulating a precise definition of “custodial interrogation”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth George MontosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Glenn W. HallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Ronald Dale Windsor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Michael Francis Agius, A/K/A Michael Rockford Ages v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. WipflerIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United States v. Guadalupe M. MoradoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. United States v. Howard C. PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Kenneth Jordan Brown v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API