Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Woods

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1990No. D.D. 86-23Published

1Per curiam

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby grant the petition of Thomas P. Woods for reinstatement to the practice of law.

Gov. Bar R. V(28) states in part:

“Requisites for Reinstatement. No person shall be reinstated unless he has established by clear and convincing evidence to the satisfaction of the *74panel hearing the petition for reinstatement that he has made appropriate restitution to the persons who were harmed by his misconduct and that he possesses all of the qualifications, mental, educational and moral, which would have been a requirement of an applicant for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API