Legal Opinion

Canter v. Aranow

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 22, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memobandum

2Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiffs to abide the event. It was error to dismiss the complaint at the end of the plaintiff’s proof. A prima facie case was established. The jury could have found that before section 276 of the Penal Law went into effect, the defendant, as attorney for the executors of the deceased’s estate, entered into an agreement whereby he was to take over some of the unfinished matters of the deceased attorney and divide with the estate 50% of all fees received by him in such matters. Such agreement, so far as…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. . CurieNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Succession of PayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newco Land Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Canter v. AranowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Canter v. AranowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Canter v. AranowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API