Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Darden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1963No. 1 Div. 917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant from judgment for plaintiff and from judgment overruling defendant’s motion for new trial in an action at law tried on the common counts for work and labor done for defendant and for supplies furnished for defendant by plaintiff.

The assignments of error recite:

“1. The verdict of the jury and the judgment of the Court is contrary to the oral charge given by the Court. (Transcript page 78)
“2. The verdict of the jury is contrary to that portion of the Court’s charge which reads as follows: ‘Gentlemen, if after considering all of the evidence you…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. King v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Penticost v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Fleming v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Pearson v. Birmingham Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cook v. SweattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Henry v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. State v. BooneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Horn v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Ladner Company Real Estate Sales, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API