Legal Opinion
State v. Baltimore
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1993No. S-91-124PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
As a result of a jury trial in the district court for Douglas County, Steave Baltimore was convicted on separate counts of possessing a controlled substance, Ritalin (methylphenidate hydrochloride) and Talwin (pentazocine), with the intent to distribute, deliver, or dispense the substances, contrary to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(l)(a) (Reissue 1989) of the Nebraska Criminal Code. As the sole assignment of error in his appeal, Baltimore claims that the Ritalin and Talwin, seized by police and introduced as physical evidence over Baltimore’s objection at trial, were unconstitutionally obtained by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. NissenNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CodyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- PONDEROSA RIDGE LLV v. Banner CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Welch v. WelchNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Cotton v. SteeleNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.