Legal Opinion

Newark Insurance v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1964No. 40439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

The liability of the defendant insurance company under the pro rata clause of the policy sued upon was limited to the proportion of the loss which the amount insured by it bore to the whole amount of insurance on the property. This fact would not, however, preclude recovery against the defendant insurance company in the full amount of coverage afforded by the policy in question since the evidence adduced on the trial of this case in behalf of the plaintiff insured authorized the finding that the loss sustained by him was greater than the total amount of combined coverage under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. WellhouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Niagara Fire Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. GwinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Rallis v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wiggins v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API