Commonwealth v. Dean
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
The instant case is taken as an appeal from judgment of sentence against appellant, Joseph Dean. Appellant filed post-trial motions which were argued and denied and which presented three issues of alleged error for our review: did the lower court err (1) in denying a motion to suppress identification evidence; (2) in permitting an officer to testify as to identification made at the line-up; (3) in failing to grant mistrial for prosecutional misconduct? We find no error in the record and we affirm the judgment of sentence.
A summary of the testimony reveals the following facts:…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HancockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DuganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MontalvoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. HaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BallardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Commonwealth v. LarkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.