Legal Opinion
Dawson v. English
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 24, 1911No. 2718PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Certiorari; from Warren superior court — Judge Meadow. May 11, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The headnote states sufficient of the facts. The present case is distinguished from Burch v. Pedigo, 113 Ga. 1157 (39 S. E. 493, 54 L. R. A. 808), by the fact that in that case only *586the note (i. e., the evidence of the indebtedness alone) was transferred, as well as by the fact that the transfer in that case was made prior to the passage of the act of 1899. It is distinguished from Swann Davis Co. v. Stanton, 7 Ga. App. 668 (67 S. E. 888), by the fact that in that case there'was no written transfer at all.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burch v. Pedigo & LyonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Swann Davis Co. v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blakely Artesian Ice Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- West Yellow Pine Co. v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Adel Banking Co. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Broach & Co. v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916