Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. Voss
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for injunction to restrain the defendant from the wrongful use of armed force in opposition to plaintiff’s removal of its pipe line.
Plaintiff laid its pipe line over farm lands owned by defendant, pursuant to the terms of right-of-way grant executed by defendant. Several years later, plaintiff began the removal of the pipe line. Defendant objected to the plantiff going on his premises for that purpose, and threatened to use armed force to prevent such action of the plaintiff. Plaintiff brought this action to enjoin such wrongful use of force.
The defendant by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brownlee v. WarmackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Wheeler v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philpott v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Banks v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Poarch v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- General Motors Corporation v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937