Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Dronen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action on a promissory note executed by tbe defendants on October 11, 1919, in tbe sum of $5,700, and payable to the plaintiff October 15, 1920. The defendants A. E. Dronen and Nils Olson did not appear or answer in the trial court and judgment went against them by default. S. O. Dronen defended and a jury returned a verdict against him for the full amount of the note. From the judgment entered on the verdict, he alone appeals.

'Flic complaint is in the ordinary form. The defendant Dronen answered admitting the execution of the note, hut alleging, in substance, that the note was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carson State Bank v. Grant Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. First Denton National Bank v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Madden v. GastonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Kenyon v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Wirtz v. WolterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Huether v. McCaull-dinsmore Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyTexas Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API