Legal Opinion

Irving H. Wolfe & Co. v. Chasmore Construction Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1927Published

1Per curiam

Defendant could not defeat plaintiff’s right to commissions by attempting to insert in the proposed contract new and onerous provisions not originally furnished as terms of sale or exchange. The broker cannot be penalized for the failure of defendant. (Glaser v. Eisen Realty Co., Inc., 187 N. Y. Supp. 171; Davidson v. Stocky, 202 N. Y. 423; Tanenbaum v. Boehm, Id. 293; Brand v. Nagle, 122 App. Div. 490; Goodman v. Hess, 56 Misc. 482; Halprin v. Schachne, 27 id. 195.)

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. . StockyNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Brand v. NagleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Goodman v. HessAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API