Legal Opinion

St. Louis County v. Kienzle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1992No. 61492PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Judge.

Edward C. Kienzle and Patricia Kienzle, appellants, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of respondent, St. Louis County. Appellants were enjoined from operating an insurance and bonding business out of their home, in violation of the zoning ordinance of St. Louis County, to the extent that such operation involved the employment of individuals who were not members of appellants’ family residing on the premises. Appellants essentially contend that the trial court erred in concluding that (1) the employment of persons other than family members residing on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Eureka v. LitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Elam v. City of St. AnnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Cook v. SaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. Coots v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. City of Festus v. WernerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Opponents of Prison Site, Inc. v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Moore v. City of ParkvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Department of Social Services v. J.F.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Fairview Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API