Legal Opinion

(PC) Henley v. Burnes

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 8, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01101Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZURI HENLEY, No. 1:19-cv-01101-DAD-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND 14 SGT. BURNES, et al., REOPENING CASE 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 19) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Zuri Henley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On May 8, 2020, the court adopted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. A.R. International Anti-Fraud Systems, Inc. v. Pretoria National Central Bureau of InterpolDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API