Vanbuskirk v. Levy
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 34 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT. cited 7 B. Mon., 557; Civil Code, secs. 30, 31; 1 Condensed Rep., 313; 2 Peters, 332; 3 B. Mon., 121; 8 lb., 403. cited 16 B. Mon., 341; 2 McLean's Rep. 581; Turney vs. Hunt, 8 B. Mon.; Civil Code, sec. 158; 13 B. Mon., 380; 3 B. Mon., 121; 4 J. J. Mar., 304.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE DUVALL
delivered the opinion op the court:
Grauman executed a note, dated New York, February 16, 1858, for $215 63, “with the current rate of exchange on New York,” payable to M. D. Levy. The note was indorsed in blank by Levy, and was delivered to Vanbuskirk, &c., in payment of goods bought of them by Grauman.
In September 1858, suit was brought on this note by the holders against Grauman and Levy, in which the latter was sought to be held liable as the indorser of a bill of exchange. Judgment in this action was rendered against Grauman by default, and as to Levy the action was dismissed…
2Cited by13 opinions
- United Hebrew Benevolent Ass'n v. BenshimolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Braintree Water Supply Co. v. Inhabitants of BraintreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Eastern Railroad v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Canadian Religious Ass'n v. ParmenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Maysville Telephone Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.