Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Action Against Lince

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1972No. 8771PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Chief Justice.

Two complaints concerning the professional conduct of the above-named attorney were filed with Grievance Committee No. 2 of the State Bar Association. The complaints were investigated by the Committee and report was made to the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court, as provided in the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Such report disclosed that in the course of its investigation of these complaints, the Grievance Committee sent written interrogatories to the respondent but that he failed to answer them as requested. The Grievance Committee, after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re MaltbyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. StumpfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API