Legal Opinion

Lee v. Meeker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR TO THE RACINE COUNTY COURT. This was an action of trespass, brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE RACINE COUNTY COURT. This was an action of trespass, brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error. The declaration contained three counts, alleging that a certain messuage and premises, with the appurtenances, situated in the town of Yorkville, in the county of Eacine and State of Wisconsin, were in possession and occupation of one John Hadley, as tenant of the plaintiff' the reversion thereof then and still belonging to the plaintiff; yet the said defendants, well knowing the premises, but contriving &c. to injure &e. the said plaintiff in her reversionary…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Crawford, J.

Without pointng out the instances in which improper and irrelevant testimony was permitted to be given on the trial of this cause in the County Court, we must reverse the judgment because competent and material evidence on the part of the present plaintiffs in error was erroneously excluded on the trial below.

•The injury complained of consisted in the partial removal of a building situate upon the lands of the ¡defendant in error, which lands, at the time of the alleged injury, were in the possession of John Hadley either as lessee and tenant under Miss Meeker (the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MoonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API