Chils v. Gronlund
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
At Law. On motion to modify remittitur. For opinion on motion to sot aside verdict, see ante, 145.
1Opinion of the CourtWhket.ee, J.
Upon the filing of the decision herein granting the defendants’motion for a new trial unless the plaintiff remits to $1,064.32, for reasons stated, the plaintiff moved to have the requirement modified to a remittitur of different sums, according to the proofs against each of the defendants, and for separate judgments thereon, and for- lessoning the amount of the remittitur so as to allow the verdict to stand for damages for the loss of sales by the plaintiff by reason of the 1,500 copies sent to Sweden. Lovejoy v. Murray, 3 Wall. 1; Insurance Co. v. Boykin, 12 Wall. 433; Chaffee v. U. S., 18…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Sessions v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Insurance Companies v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Sawin v. KennySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. TrawickTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- San Marcos Electric Light & Power Co. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908