Legal Opinion
Port Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 10, 1981No. Appeal, No. 974 C.D. 1979Published
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
The Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAT) appeals as of right from a preliminary injunction of the' Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County1 that restrained PAT from implementing changes in the job classifications and the operation of its upholstery shop (Shop) pending a final arbitration decision.
This case is another in the continuing saga of conflicts between PAT and Division 85, Amalgamated Transit Union (Division 85). This appeal had its genesis in a labor dispute that arose when PAT unilaterally attempted to improve the operational efficiency of its Shop.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lever Brothers Company v. International Chemical Workers Union, Local 217Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Eazor Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 1384 and the Amalgamated Council of Greyhound Divisions, Afl-Cio v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Columbia Local, American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. William F. Bolger, as Postmaster General of the United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.