Legal Opinion

Jack Allen Barber v. Ray H. Page, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1967No. 9015_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

For the second time, appellant appeals from a judgment denying him, a state prisoner, habeas corpus relief. In Barber v. Page, 10 Cir., 355 F.2d 171, we remanded because the record did not show that appellant had exhausted his state remedies. The district court held a second evidentiary hearing, found that the state remedies had in fact been exhausted, and denied relief.

The only point for consideration is whether the appellant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to be confronted by the witnesses against him. He, an individual named Woods, and at least one other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Motes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Gilmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Jack Allen Barber v. Ray H. Page, Warden, Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. BeadleWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. In Re Habeas Corpus of BishopCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API