Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Duncan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1947No. File No. 8932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSickel, P.J.

This action was brought by Luther C. Parrish and Bertha Parrish, plaintiffs, for the purpose of determining adverse claims to two lots in the City of Lemmon, Perkins county. Alfred S. Tubbs, one of the defendants, filed an answer containing a cross complaint, in which he alleged that he was the owner of the lots and that plaintiffs’ claim of title is based upon a tax deed issued to Perkins county, the other defendant, and that conveyance was made by the county to plaintiffs. The defendant Tubbs alleges that the tax deed is void and tenders in his cross complaint the “amount of real estate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hussman v. DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Baird v. StubbinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Doling v. Hyde CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lasell v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Clark v. DarlingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broadhurst v. American Colloid CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lambert v. BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Knoll v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API