Scaling v. Beggs
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*211MURRAY, Chief Justice.
This is a double appeal. Charles W. Scaling and others, plaintiffs below, appealed from the judgment because it denied to them a recovery of one-half of all the oil, gas and other minerals in and under and that may be produced from a tract of land containing about 151.67 acres, situated in San Patricio County, adjacent to the City of Portland, Texas, and fully described in the pleadings. George -' Beggs and others, defendants, appealed because the judgment awarded plaintiffs a recovery of one-half of the oil, gas and other minerals in and under 34.75 acres out of said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mansel v. CastlesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Rogers v. RogersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Poitevent v. ScarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Connolly v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Fortenberry v. CruseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buccaneer's Cove, Inc. v. Mainland Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Babb v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Scaling v. BeggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960