Legal Opinion

Scaling v. Beggs

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1960No. 13540PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*211MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This is a double appeal. Charles W. Scaling and others, plaintiffs below, appealed from the judgment because it denied to them a recovery of one-half of all the oil, gas and other minerals in and under and that may be produced from a tract of land containing about 151.67 acres, situated in San Patricio County, adjacent to the City of Portland, Texas, and fully described in the pleadings. George -' Beggs and others, defendants, appealed because the judgment awarded plaintiffs a recovery of one-half of the oil, gas and other minerals in and under 34.75 acres out of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mansel v. CastlesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Rogers v. RogersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Poitevent v. ScarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Connolly v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Fortenberry v. CruseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buccaneer's Cove, Inc. v. Mainland Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  2. Babb v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Scaling v. BeggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API