Young Women's Christian Ass'n of the National Capital Area v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
These consolidated appeals are from an order of the Superior Court sustaining tax assessments against the property in question for the tax years 1992, 1993, and 1994. The trial judge, sitting as trier of fact, ruled for the government at the close of the appellant-taxpayer’s case because appellant (hereafter “YWCA”) had not met its burden of proving anything “erroneous, arbitrary, [or] unlawful” in the assessments, quoting District of Columbia v. Burlington Apartment House Co., 375 A.2d 1052, 1057 (D.C.1977).1 In particular, although it presented testimony of a large…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Burlington Apartment House Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wolf v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- District of Columbia v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brisker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- District of Columbia v. CraigDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- CHH CAPITAL HOTEL PARTNERS, LP v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Davis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021