Legal Opinion

State v. McCrum

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The defendant was tried and convicted in the district court for Hennepin county, before Young, J., and a jury, on an indictment for abduction, and appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Defendant was indicted under subdivision 2, section 240, Penal Code, which reads: “A person who' * * * in*155veigles or entices an unmarried female under the age of twenty-five (25) years, of previous chaste character, into a house of ill fame, or of assignation, or elsewhere, for the purpose of prostitution or sexual intercourse, * * * is guilty of abduction.” The indictment alleges that he did inveigle and entice the female named into a certain dwelling-house, for the purpose of there and then having sexual intercourse with her, but fails to allege, and the evidence did not show, that the house…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Berg v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. SchuchmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Consolidation of School District No. 30 v. Consolidated School District No. 30Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API