Legal Opinion

Mears v. Cornwall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff brought suit in the circuit court for the county of Kalamazoo in. trover for a span of horses. The defendants claimed that the horses belonged to one William Cornwall, and were levied upon for his debt to Valentine Cornwall by the defendant Wise, who was a- constable, under a writ of attachment issued out of a justice’s court. The verdict of the jury was in favor of the defendants. The court refused a new trial, and entered judgment upon the verdict.

The undisputed facts are that at the time the horses were taken by Wise they were in possession of the plaintiff, who claimed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hickey v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Lewis v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Farley, Norris & Co. v. BuddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merrill v. LeisenringMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API