Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pelz-Greenstein Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 25, 1929No. 3198Published

1Concurrence

Garrett and LeNroot, Judges,

specially concurring: We concur the conclusion reached by the majority in the instant case without, however, joining in the reasons given in their opinion, but for the particular reason that we do not think the processes applied to the goods in question constituted such a manufacture as was contemplated by section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the material portion of which reads:

Sec. 313. That upon the exportation of articles manufactured or produced in the United States with the use of imported merchandise the full amount of the duties paid upon the merchandise…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rentner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API