Mirsky v. Essex Shirt Co.

In this action to recover for alleged loans made to the defendants, defendant Edith Mirsky moves for an order amending the summons and complaint; for judgment dismissing the complaint for insufficiency pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice and judg*716ment dismissing the third and fourth causes of action pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, on the ground that these causes of action are barred by the Statute of Limitations. Defendant Essex Shirt Co. Inc. moves for summary judgment pursuant to the provisions of rule 113 of the Buies of…