Legal Opinion

State v. Vansickle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 1989No. 55171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Defendant, Mark Yansickle, appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his probation and sentencing him to six months in the St. Charles County Jail. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the charge against him nor the jurisdiction of the trial court. Other asserted errors, as here, in probation revocation proceedings must be challenged by a writ of habeas corpus not by a direct appeal. E.g. State v. Henderson, 750 S.W.2d 507, 516 (Mo.App.1988); State v. Morgan, 654 S.W.2d 326 (Mo.App.1983); Boyer v. State, 646 S.W.2d 388…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Boyer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. MorganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BurnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API