Legal Opinion
Williams v. Coleman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1930No. 2686PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebb, J.
In this action plaintiff, W. A. Williams, alleged that certain real estate owned by him had been seized by John W. Coleman, sheriff, in execution of *221a judgment rendered in the cause of J. L. Burdine vs. W. A. Williams (plaintiff here) and W. M. Smith, and that the property had been advertised for sale. He further alleged that the judgment was null and void for the reasons that it was obtained on insufficient evidence, without the knowledge of plaintiff, W. A. Williams, through fraud and misrepresentation, and on evidence that was false and untrue, and that, in order to conserve his rights, it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Camors v. MaddenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Lhote & Co. v. Church Extension Soc. of Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Cushing v. SambolaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
- Strain's Heirs v. LyonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franzen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Strickland v. W. Horace Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Oscar L. Strickland, and Cross-Appellee v. W. Horace Williams Company, Inc., and the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., and Cross-Appellants. W. Horace Williams Company, Inc., and the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., and Cross-Appellants v. Oscar L. Strickland, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- McCaskill v. Lyon Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934