Armstrong v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous
The defendant in error, Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, alleging that a controversy existed between it and plaintiff in error, hereinafter mentioned as the state, as to the application and effect of chapter 161, ’35 C.S.A. (chapter 216, S.L. 1935), an initiated law commonly designated as the “Colorado Chain Store License Law,” instituted a declaratory judgment action in the district court praying for an adjudication that the Ford Company was not liable for the payment of chain-store license taxes on Ford dealers, associate dealers and subdealers doing business in this state. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Midwestern Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Richardson v. El Paso Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Standard Oil Co. of Texas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McNichols v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1979