Diversified Communications, Inc. v. Godard
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
HORNBY, Justice.
The defendant appeals the Superior Court’s (Penobscot County; Browne, J.) af-firmance of the District Court’s (Bangor; Cox, J.) grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff. The District Court based its award of summary judgment upon matters the defendant was deemed to have admitted by failing to file a timely response to requests for admissions. We affirm.
The District Court’s finding that the plaintiff properly served the requests for admissions upon the defendant is not clearly erroneous. Responses were not served within the 30 days required by M.R. Civ.P. 36 and indeed were…
2Cited by6 opinions
- P.R.S. International, Inc. v. Shred Pax Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Martin v. SimmonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- PLATZ ASSOCIATES v. FinleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Commissioner of Human Services v. Waldoboro Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- RAYMOND, PSONAK v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.