United States v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1ConcurrenceCrawford, Chief Judge
I concur with reversing this conviction based solely on appellate government counsel’s concession. Presumably, the Government prefers to have the findings of guilt set aside and to shoulder the expense of a rehearing rather than to fashion a remedy to provide appellant the benefit of his plea bargain. See United States v. Mitchell, 50 MJ 79, 82-83 (1999); United States v. Olson, 25 MJ 293, 299 (CMA 1987). Cf. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971). Government counsel’s capitulation despite the Court of Criminal Appeal’s findings, a shared belief that United…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BedaniaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. PooleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. HuntUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.