People v. Peters
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of robbery in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; People v Laviscount, 57 AD3d 1007, 1008 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see Penal Law § 160.00 [2]; § 160.10 [2]; People v Mattis, 46 AD3d 929, 931-932 [2007]).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SpeaksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. NealonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. PeoplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. NealonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.