Legal Opinion

Lawrence Nat. Bank v. Rice

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1936No. 1254PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

The record upon which this appeal was heard made it appear that appellees filed an original bill of complaint in the court below. Neither in the record, the assign*643ments of error, the briefs, nor the oral arguments was there an .intimation that the cause orginally was brought in the state court, removed to the federal court, a motion to remand filed, argued and overruled. The case turned upon the construction of a contract by which a national bank had satisfied its creditors in order to accomplish its dissolution as authorized by the -National Banking Act, and was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Bank of the United States v. DeveauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Wyman v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  2. Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Wales v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. City Nat. Bank v. Wichita Royalty Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1937
  5. District of Columbia v. WardellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API