Legal Opinion

People v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to object when the 10-year-old witness was sworn, defendant failed to preserve for review the issue of the witness’s competency to testify (see, People v Johnson, 185 NY 219, 228). In view of the strength of the People’s case, we decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice (cf., People v Ranum, 122 AD2d 959, 961). We reject defendant’s contention that the sentence for these multiple acts of forcible rape upon four young girls was harsh and excessive. Defendant’s consecutive sentences are deemed by law to be limited to a term of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. RanumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BittingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. SirmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. ZeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. ZeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API