Gregory v. Beasley
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtDeWITT, J.
The question presented is whether or not Tom M. Beasley (now deceased) was liable, as a co-surety, for contribution to complainants Gregory and Garrett. The bill was filed by them against W. H. Denney and the administratrix of Beasley. The Chancellor dismissed the bill. The complainants only insist, upon appeal that he should have held that Beasley was liable.
The obligation upon which it is contended that Beasley should be treated as a surety was a promissory note for $10,000, dated June 18, 1920, payable, to the order of W. R. Denney, and finally paid by complainants. This note was given for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnett v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Brooke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Northwestern National Bank v. Great Falls Opera House Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
- Bell v. Boyd & BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Hall v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of Crockett v. CullipherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Hayes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
- Central State Bank v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937