Legal Opinion

Mahon v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 8, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-11611-WGYPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680. The plaintiff Michael Mahon (“Mahon”) alleges that the failure of the United States1 to *145alter a railing on the second story portico of the Commandant’s House on the Charlestown Navy Yard resulted in Mahon falling over that railing and sustaining severe injuries. Mahon further alleges that in its dealings with Eastern National and Amelia Occasions, Inc. (“Amelia Occasions”), the United States was required to employ a so-called “concession contract,” which would…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Blackburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Fothergill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API