Taylor v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion
Gilkison, J.,
Concurring. — I concur with the majority opinion of Flanagan, J., and submit herewith some additional ideas of my own which I think are applicable to the situation presented in this appeal.
This is not a civil action and procedural rules and laws with respect to the power of the trial court to hold in abeyance its finding and judgment after the *403evidence is fully heard and both sides have rested in a civil action, do not apply to this case.
This is a criminal action in which the right to liberty of a human being is at issue. From the time the action was filed until…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Boenert v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- People ex rel. Smith v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Todd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Commonwealth v. MaloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- In re FlintUtah Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954