Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Taylor v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1954No. 29,102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion

Gilkison, J.,

Concurring. — I concur with the majority opinion of Flanagan, J., and submit herewith some additional ideas of my own which I think are applicable to the situation presented in this appeal.

This is not a civil action and procedural rules and laws with respect to the power of the trial court to hold in abeyance its finding and judgment after the *403evidence is fully heard and both sides have rested in a civil action, do not apply to this case.

This is a criminal action in which the right to liberty of a human being is at issue. From the time the action was filed until…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Boenert v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People ex rel. Smith v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Todd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Commonwealth v. MaloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. In re FlintUtah Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API