Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stover

Hamilton County Municipal Court

Decided March 5, 1987No. 86 CV 25373Published

1Opinion of the CourtPainter, J.

This matter came on for trial to the court, neither party disputing the relevant facts.

For many years Willard Hughes maintained a charge account with plaintiff Sears, Roebuck & Co., making many purchases and generally paying his account when due. Defendant Phyllis Stover is the daughter of Willard Hughes, and lived with him for some period of time shortly before his death. Upon his death, Willard Hughes owed Sears $3,311.08. Though his account may have been current at the time of his death, he left no assets, and no estate was opened.

Defendant admits that of the above amount, purchases…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Idaho Lumber, Inc. v. BuckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Cleveland Trust Co. v. SnyderOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. RagucciNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Fifth Third Bank/Visa v. GilbertHamilton County Municipal Court · 1984
  5. Andy's Glass Shops, Inc. v. RealtyOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API