People v. Alvarado
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Judge MILLER
specially concurring.
I concur fully in parts I and II of the majority opinion. I also concur in the result reached in part III, but I respectfully disagree with the majority's reasoning and therefore write separately.
In summary, I would not reach defendant's constitutional arguments that his sentences were improperly enhanced pursuant to seetion 18-1.38401(9), C.R.S.2010 (subsection (9)), because of noncompliance with the requirements of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Denver Publishing Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People v. ChippewaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.