Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Alvarado

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2011No. 07CA1507Published

1Concurrence

Judge MILLER

specially concurring.

I concur fully in parts I and II of the majority opinion. I also concur in the result reached in part III, but I respectfully disagree with the majority's reasoning and therefore write separately.

In summary, I would not reach defendant's constitutional arguments that his sentences were improperly enhanced pursuant to seetion 18-1.38401(9), C.R.S.2010 (subsection (9)), because of noncompliance with the requirements of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Denver Publishing Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. People v. ChippewaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API