Andrews v. Independent School District No. 29
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Chief Justice.
The appellants [parents] contend the ap-pellees [School Board] violated the Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 1981, §§ 301 et seq., commonly known as the Sunshine Act, by (a) failure to give notice that the issue of increasing eligibility requirements, for participation in extracurricular activities would be discussed at the School Board meetings; (b) that the committee which prepared the eligibility requirements had decision-making authority and failed to hold open meetings; and (c) that the School Board’s ratification of the committee’s acts made in violation of the Open…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sanders v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- HAWORTH BD. OF EDUCATION, ETC. v. HavensCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
3Cited by16 opinions
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE v. CITY OF NORMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Wilson v. City of TecumsehCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Patterson v. Town of MuldrowCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE v. CITY OF NORMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.