Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Lattin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Leavenworth District Court. ActtoN brought by Lattin against Monroe, to recover damages for injuries to a horse, buggy and harness. Trial and judgment for the plaintiff, February 10, 1879. The defendant brings the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HobtON, C. J.:

This was an action brought by defendant in error against plaintiff in error, upon the ground that plaintiff in error hired of him a horse, buggy and harness; that through his negligence the horse ran away, and that the horse, buggy and harness were damaged in the sum of five hundred and fifty dollars. The cause was tried before the court and a jury. The jury returned a verdict for defendant in error for $173, and also answered several special questions, submitted to them at the request of plaintiff in error. A motion for judgment over the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Streett v. LaumierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. City of Parsons v. LindsaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MackeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Solomon Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Broadie v. RandallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API