Legal Opinion

Thompson v. One Anchor & Two Anchor Chains

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 26, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by Horace H. Thompson against One Anchor and Two Anchor Chains, with Brotherton and Poissant as intervening libelants.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

The sum of $511.04 has been agreed upon by the claimant and libelant and intervening libelants as the amount to be paid for recovering the anchor and chains. This amount has been paid into court by claimant, and the contest is between libel-ant and intervening libelants over the division of the fund.

Saturday, June 27, 1914, the barge George E. Hartnell was blown ashore near the Duluth entry during a storm, and lost her anchors and chains in Lake Superior about a half mile from the shore. Sunday morning libelant met Capt. Kidd, who represented the insurance people and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The BlackwallSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Canadian-Australian S. S. Line v. The StrathnevisDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1896
  3. In re AlbrechtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1877
  4. The HesperDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1883
  5. The St. GeorgeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Treasure Salvors, Inc. v. The Unidentified Wrecked And Abandoned Sailing VesselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Treasure Salvors, Inc. v. Unidentified Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing VesselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Campbell Brown & Co. v. ELKINGWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Platoro Ltd. v. the Unidentified Remains of a VesselDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1981
  5. JTR Enterprises, LLC v. An Unknown Quantity of Colombian Emeralds, Amethysts & Quartz CrystalsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API