Legal Opinion
State v. Holliday
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 17, 2009No. AC 30482PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendant, Dean B. Holliday, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence, which he filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence. He argues that his consecutive sentences for attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-134 (a) (2), and conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (2) were not authorized by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. HollidaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. FranklinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- State v. HollidaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010