Legal Opinion

CHEVERE RODRIGUEZ v. Pagan

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided February 2, 2006No. CIV.00-2039 RLAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING CODEFENDANT PADILLA’S MOTION TO DISMISS

ACOSTA, District Judge.

Before the Court is codefendant EDWIN PADILLA’s motion to dismiss the complaint based on lack of jurisdiction, failure to state a claim and failure to file within the statute of limitations 1 (docket No. 178). Plaintiffs have opposed (docket No. 179).

Background

PADILLA claims that he is not and has never been an employee of the Municipality of Bayamon. Therefore, he argues, he was not acting under color of law at the time that the incidents in the complaint occurred and thus jurisdiction is lacking under 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Alex C. Glaros v. Richard PerseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Mildred E. FRANCIS-SOBEL, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE, Everett O. Ware, Et Al., Defendants, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Chévere-Rodríguez v. PagánCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API