Legal Opinion

Riley v. Rochester

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1922No. 17168PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, J. J.:

Epitomized Opinion.

In this case the validity and priority of two coal leases are involved. The above plaintiffs were lessees of a duly executed but unrecorded coal lease, the above defendants were transferees of a properly executed but subsequently recorded lease of the same property. Other defendants were the owners of the property and the lessors in both leases.

The case was submitted in the court of appeals upon the pleadings, transcripts of the testimony and other proof, and judgment was rendered in favor of the above defendant, it being found that they were purchasers of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Four Howards, Ltd. v. J & F Wenz Road Investment, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Cuvier Press Club v. Fourth & Race Street Associates, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Deal v. Garaux Bros. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API