Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc. v. James

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 10, 1997No. 1950030, 1950031, 1950240, 1950241, 1950408, 1950409 and 1950917Published

1ConcurrenceHooper, Chief Justice

I have not changed my position as to the judgment in the Liability Phase. I would rather this Court reach its own conclusion than have it bound by the ruling of one trial judge. I do believe, however, that today’s ruling is reasonable and that it gives the legislature a reasonable opportunity to address the problem dealt with in the Liability Phase judgment. I therefore concur in today’s action denying rehearing and modifying the January 10,1997, judgment.

SEE, Justice (addressing motion to recuse).

The Harper Appellees assert that I should recuse myself, because the outcome of this litigation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TurnbowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API