Legal Opinion

Wall v. Bankers Life Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 23, 1929No. 38892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

The primary dispute in this litigation arises over the contractual rights of the plaintiffs-appellants, Joseph Wall et al., William A. Lindly et al., and Curtis Boughton, and the interveners-appellants, J. J. Lynch, L. J. Klemm et al., Arthur B. Hightshoe et al., and Frederick S. Baird, as certificate holders in the Bankers Life Company of Des Moines, a mutual insurance corporation, defendant-appellee. Consolidation was made of the several suits. A solution of the problem, therefore, involves the specification of those rights and the determination as to whether or not there has been any…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin & King's River Canal & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Looker v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Reynolds v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lubin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  2. Adair Benevolent Society v. State, Insurance Division of the State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Home Insurance v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Robertson v. Security Benefit Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. Rechow v. Bankers Life Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API