Legal Opinion

Lovejoy v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1915No. 7838PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The complaint in this case alleged in substance that the defendant operates a spur or branch railroad track running from its main line near the city of Leadville, to the Ibex mining property. That, on the day of the accident complained of, the engineer of defendant company was in full charge of the conduct arid operation of the defendant’s engine and train operated on the said branch or spur of *224its road. That there was no conductor for the train, but that the engineer was in full charge thereof. That the engine was coupled to, and engaged in pushing, a string of freight cars, had a tender…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Wilton v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Burg v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Whitehead v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  5. Brill v. EddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keller v. Koca ex rel. AlparSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Bernardi v. Community Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Dunbar v. OlivieriSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Colwell v. OatmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Myers v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API