In re the Estate of Seavey
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Audubon District Court. — How. EL E. Deem.ee, Judge. This is an appeal by the administrator from an order removing him, and an order nunc pro tunc, allowing a claim in favor of Helen N. Gault.
1Opinion of the CourtGivest, J.
I. The appellee’s motion to strike the abstract, and dismiss the appeal, was submitted with the case, as was also his motion to strike the transcript. The denials as to the abstract and amended abstracts are such as to require the filing of a transcript. The grounds of the motion to strike the transcript are not sufficient, nor are the grounds for dismissing the appeal. Both motions are overr>' led, and the case is considered upon the transcript and arguments., II. The only qiu stion made by the appellant in ! argument is that the d 'strict court had no authority to make the nunc pro tunc…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goodrich v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
3Cited by2 opinions
- Locher v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Gault v. SicklesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892