Buchman v. Buchman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Judge.
We reverse the provision of the final judgment of dissolution which required the wife to pay $100 per month to the husband as permanent periodic alimony.
The husband did not appear at the final hearing and no evidence was adduced on his behalf other than a social security certificate, admitted by stipulation, indicating that he was 100% disabled. Testimony indicated the husband received monthly benefits from social security in the amount of $596. Testimony also indicated that the wife had a net monthly income of $626.78. She was awarded custody of their minor child which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sisson v. SissonSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- DeHart v. DeHartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Lytton v. LyttonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Seale v. SealeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- George v. GeorgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ziegler v. KleinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992